9-11/anomalies/collapse/debate


 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * "Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead." ("point 0" on LessWrong)
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * Evidence for or against their involvement does not of itself affect the evidence for or against demolition.
 * Although the overall strategy for dealing with Iraq was a huge mess, the initial invasion was reportedly done extremely well -- carried out by our well-trained and competent military.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.
 * The refutation should be supplied, otherwise this is essentially argument from authority.