2010-06-14 My testimony

2010-06-14 Lawrence Lessig ChangeCongress \American Civil Liberties Union\democracy\US Constitutional Convention 2010-06-14 My testimony My testimony My testimony This is the complete text of an email sent by Lawrence Lessig to the ChangeCongress mailing list on 2010-06-14: On 2010-06-01 I testified before the Rhode Island Legislature in support of a resolution calling a federal Constitutional Convention.

If passed, this resolution would make Rhode Island the first state to call a convention to remove the toxic influence of special interest money from our political system. This is a critical opportunity to take a concrete first step toward electoral reform.

We've created a petition to let Americans in every state show their support for this effort in Rhode Island. Thousands of people have already signed on -- please take a minute to join us:

http://callaconvention.org/RIpetition

After I finished my testimony last Tuesday, you won't believe who took the microphone to speak out against the resolution: the director of the Rhode Island ACLU.

The ACLU, of course, supported the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United, but that wasn't the amazing part of the testimony. The extraordinary part, at least to my ears, was their dissing of democracy. To the suggestion that it might make sense for Americans to deliberate about whether a constitutional right to unlimited corporate spending in elections makes sense, Steve Brown of the ACLU said:

"I'm not sure it's in the best interest of this country to be spending hours, days, weeks, and months discussing some of the most controversial issues in this country as to whether they should be part of our constitution. Regardless of whether it is a red state or a blue state... this is not how legislatures in the 50 states should be debating very controversial issues."

Now, I'm a card-carrying member of the ACLU, and I respect their decades of work defending liberty in America. But who, in the ACLU's view, is supposed to be "discussing some of the most controversial issues in this country"? Judges alone? Or judges advised by ACLU lawyers? If indeed the ACLU's idea of democracy means only judges and lawyers can have a say about what our Constitution means, then it might be time to think again about carrying that card.

Our Constitution was not made for lawyers. It was not to be trusted exclusively to judges. Yet somehow we have allowed a professional class of "civil libertarians" and judges to claim to themselves alone the right to say what our fundamental law should be. This is not just contrary to American traditions. It is destructive of democracy.

Our Constitution says nothing about the liberty of corporations to engage in politics. What it does say, though, is that the government should be accountable to "We, the People" through elected officials who represent our views and interests.

But now the corrupting influence of special interest money has denied us our say in Congress's decisions. It's time for us to stand up and take it back.

Sign our petition in support of Rhode Island's call for a federal Constitutional Convention:

http://callaconvention.org/RIpetition

Thank you.

-- Lawrence Lessig

P.S. You can watch a video of my testimony at the Rhode Island State House and read my latest Huffington Post piece about my testimony here:
 * http://callaconvention.org/RItestimony
 * http://callaconvention.org/RIHuffPo

&ldquo;After I finished my testimony last Tuesday, you won't believe who took the microphone to speak out against the resolution: the director of the Rhode Island ACLU.&rdquo;   