2011/08/01/1059/link

From Issuepedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  • link: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2389078,00.asp
  • title: Google+ Real Names Policy Is About Brands, Not People
  • when: 2011-07-25
  • author: Lance Ulanoff
  • summary: Google may have inadvertently swept up some users and handles that were legitimate or simply too innocuous to cause any brand any kind of harm, but I think the intention is clear: to protect brands and businesses from everyday Google service users who might infringe upon their trademarks and brand identities.
  • topics: Google Google+/policy/naming

[edit] Comments

This theory doesn't seem consistent with the pattern of user suspensions. None of the suspended user names have been even remotely like any trademarks or business properties that I'm aware of. --Woozle 11:06, 1 August 2011 (EDT)


Facts about 2011/08/01/1059/linkRDF feed
AuthorLance Ulanoff  +
Page typeLink  +
SummaryGoogle may have inadvertently swept up som Google may have inadvertently swept up some users and handles that were legitimate or simply too innocuous to cause any brand any kind of harm, but I think the intention is clear: to protect brands and businesses from everyday Google service users who might infringe upon their trademarks and brand identities. pon their trademarks and brand identities.
Thing typeArticle  +
TitleGoogle+ Real Names Policy Is About Brands, Not People  +
TopicGoogle  + and Google+/policy/naming  +
When posted25 July 2011  +
URLThis property is a special property in this wiki.http:////www.pcmag.com/article2/0%2C2817%2C2389078%2C00.asp  +
Personal tools
bookmarking